Wanting to display the irony in sexualising women's breasts when they're breastfeeding.
Here the section showing the page in the newspaper is page 3 is enlarged, showing the audience that the image is in fact on a page 3 article. However the hierarchy of the newspaper means this isn't the first thing the audience would read, you read the title first which has no link to the design.
Taking the background and filling with black textured paper, allows the newspaper too stand out in contrast against a darker background. However the same issues as the previous image apply.
To try and make it more obvious that an alteration has been made, placing the before and after image of the newspaper on the poster was done. Still it isn't super obvious what the aim of the poster is, can notice the difference between the two but doesn't translate as strongly as a visual as originally thought.
Editing the background, making it darker to make the image stand out more?
Having the newspaper cover of the breastfeeding woman next to more page 3 articles of women not breastfeeding but flaunting their boobs on the page. Shows more contrast in the images. Does this highlight the irony or not?
| Having with other original page 3 |
![]() |
| Having portrait - doesn't fit the format well, as the poster is landscape |
Having multiple images of other page 3's doesn't add to the message, if anything it takes the focus away from the breastfeeding image. Wanting to evoke sympathy not suspicion, using many images of page 3 magazines makes it seem in some way less.


No comments:
Post a Comment